Skip to content
Wakilii

Rabies Act

Ordinance 8 of 1935 Current version · as at 31 December 2023

An Act to provide for the suppression of rabies.

Enacted1935
Commenced29 June 1935
Last amended28 July 2023Act 17 of 2023
Point-in-time consolidation · as at 31 December 2023. This page may not reflect amendments made after that date. Confirm the current position against the latest Uganda Gazette before relying on it.

About this Act

An Act to provide for the suppression of rabies.

Jurisdiction
Uganda
Type
Principal Legislation
Status
In force
Language
English

Amendments

1 amending instrument
  1. 28 July 2023 Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 Act 17 of 2023

Full text of the Act

0 parts · 12 sections

Enhanced Annotated View adds approved, source-linked propositions, operative requirements, judicial passages, related provisions, amendment notes and authority status. Choose Original PDF to inspect the source consolidation.

Uganda

Rabies Act

Commenced on 29 June 1935

[This is the version of this document at 31 December 2023.]

An Act to provide for the suppression of rabies.

1. Interpretation

In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires

"currency point" has the value assigned to it in the Schedule to this Act;

"disease" means rabies;

"diseased" means infected with rabies;

"dog" includes any animal of the canine tribe;

"proclaimed district" means any area to which this Act may, by statutory order, be applied by the Minister;

"stray dog" means any dog found wandering at large in any public place and not being under the control or charge of any person;

"suspected" means suspected of rabies.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Definition

This section supplies the definitions or statutory meaning governing “Interpretation”.

“In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires "currency point" has the value assigned to it in the Schedule to this Act;”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

Use this definition when interpreting other provisions that employ the language addressed by “Interpretation”.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

6
  1. "disease" means rabies;
  2. "diseased" means infected with rabies;
  3. "dog" includes any animal of the canine tribe;
  4. "proclaimed district" means any area to which this Act may, by statutory order, be applied by the Minister;
  5. "stray dog" means any dog found wandering at large in any public place and not being under the control or charge of any person;
  6. "suspected" means suspected of rabies.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

2. Power to seize, detain or destroy stray dogs

(1)

An administrative officer, veterinary officer, police officer or any person authorised by the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may seize and detain any stray dog in a proclaimed district.

(2)

In any proclaimed district, an administrative officer, veterinary officer, police officer or any person expressly authorised to do so by the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology, may shoot or otherwise destroy any stray dog found in any public place or any stray dog which he or she has reason to suppose to be suspected.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Power to seize, detain or destroy stray dogs”.

“(1) An administrative officer, veterinary officer, police officer or any person authorised by the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may seize and detain any stray dog in a proclaimed district.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

2
  1. (1) An administrative officer, veterinary officer, police officer or any person authorised by the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may seize and detain any stray dog in a proclaimed district.
  2. (2) In any proclaimed district, an administrative officer, veterinary officer, police officer or any person expressly authorised to do so by the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology, may shoot or otherwise destroy any stray dog found in any public place or any stray dog which he or she has reason to suppose to be suspected.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

3. Dogs seized to be impounded and notice given

(1)

Every dog seized under section 2 shall be detained in a place appointed for that purpose by the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology until the owner has claimed it and paid all expenses incurred by reason of the detention.

(2)

Notice of the seizure of a dog shall without delay be given to the owner, if known.

(3)

When a dog has remained under detention for three clear days without the owner claiming it and paying all expenses incurred by reason of its detention, a veterinary officer may cause it to be sold or destroyed.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Procedural rule

This section establishes the governing procedure for “Dogs seized to be impounded and notice given”.

“(1) Every dog seized under section 2 shall be detained in a place appointed for that purpose by the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology until the owner has claimed it and paid all expenses incurred by reason of the detention.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A litigant should address this rule at the procedural stage named in the section and preserve evidence of compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

3
  1. (1) Every dog seized under section 2 shall be detained in a place appointed for that purpose by the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology until the owner has claimed it and paid all expenses incurred by reason of the detention.
  2. (2) Notice of the seizure of a dog shall without delay be given to the owner, if known.
  3. (3) When a dog has remained under detention for three clear days without the owner claiming it and paying all expenses incurred by reason of its detention, a veterinary officer may cause it to be sold or destroyed.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions
Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

4. Order on owner

Any magistrate, if satisfied on a complaint made by any person that a dog in a proclaimed district is not kept under proper control, may make an order on the owner or the person in charge of the dog directing that the dog be kept under proper control, and every person failing to comply with the order commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine of two and a half currency points for every day during which the default continues

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Order on owner”.

“Any magistrate, if satisfied on a complaint made by any person that a dog in a proclaimed district is not kept under proper control, may make an order on the owner or the person in charge of the dog directing that the dog be kept under proper control, and every person failing to comply with the order commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine of two and a half currency points for every day during which the default continues”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. Any magistrate, if satisfied on a complaint made by any person that a dog in a proclaimed district is not kept under proper control, may make an order on the owner or the person in charge of the dog directing that the dog be kept under proper control, and every person failing to comply with the order commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine of two and a half currency points for every day during which the default continues
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

5. Duties of owners and persons in charge of diseased or suspected dogs

(1)

Every owner or person in charge of a diseased dog shall immediately cause it to be destroyed, and shall without delay give notice thereof to a veterinary officer.

(2)

Every owner or person in charge of a suspected dog shall immediately cause the dog to be destroyed or to be securely tied or otherwise confined, and shall without delay give notice of the action taken to a veterinary officer.

(3)

Any person who fails to comply with the requirements of subsection (1) or (2) commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding twelve currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or both.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Duties of owners and persons in charge of diseased or suspected dogs”.

“(1) Every owner or person in charge of a diseased dog shall immediately cause it to be destroyed, and shall without delay give notice thereof to a veterinary officer.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

3
  1. (1) Every owner or person in charge of a diseased dog shall immediately cause it to be destroyed, and shall without delay give notice thereof to a veterinary officer.
  2. (2) Every owner or person in charge of a suspected dog shall immediately cause the dog to be destroyed or to be securely tied or otherwise confined, and shall without delay give notice of the action taken to a veterinary officer.
  3. (3) Any person who fails to comply with the requirements of subsection (1) or (2) commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding twelve currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or both.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

6. Powers in respect of diseased or suspected dogs

An administrative officer, veterinary officer or police officer receiving credible information of, or having reasonable grounds for suspecting, the existence of rabies, shall forthwith cause the matter to be investigated, and for that purpose may cause any dog to be examined and any diseased or suspected dog to be destroyed or otherwise dealt with as he or she may think necessary

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Powers in respect of diseased or suspected dogs”.

“An administrative officer, veterinary officer or police officer receiving credible information of, or having reasonable grounds for suspecting, the existence of rabies, shall forthwith cause the matter to be investigated, and for that purpose may cause any dog to be examined and any diseased or suspected dog to be destroyed or otherwise dealt with as he or she may think necessary”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. An administrative officer, veterinary officer or police officer receiving credible information of, or having reasonable grounds for suspecting, the existence of rabies, shall forthwith cause the matter to be investigated, and for that purpose may cause any dog to be examined and any diseased or suspected dog to be destroyed or otherwise dealt with as he or she may think necessary
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

7. Power of Commissioner to issue orders in case of outbreak or expected outbreak of disease

(1)

The Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may, in case of an outbreak or expected outbreak of rabies in any area in Uganda, issue orders for all or any of the following purposes-

(a)

providing for the keeping of dogs under control by the owner, or the person in charge of the dogs, in such manner as may be prescribed by the order;

(b)

providing for the seizure, detention and disposal, including destruction, of dogs not being kept under control in the manner prescribed by the orders;

(c)

providing for any dogs to be treated in such manner as may be prescribed by the order;

(d)

providing that no person shall move or cause to be moved any dog out of the area unless he or she has first obtained the written permission of a veterinary officer;

(e)

providing for the recovery by any veterinary officer of the expenses incurred in respect of the detention of any dog seized and detained and disposed of under such orders from the owner of the dog.

(2)

Such orders shall be notified in such manner as the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may think fit, and unless disallowed by the Minister, and until so disallowed, shall have the full force of law, and every person failing to comply with any such order commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding six currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months, or both.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Power of Commissioner to issue orders in case of outbreak or expected outbreak of disease”.

“(1) The Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may, in case of an outbreak or expected outbreak of rabies in any area in Uganda, issue orders for all or any of the following purposes-”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

7
  1. (1) The Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may, in case of an outbreak or expected outbreak of rabies in any area in Uganda, issue orders for all or any of the following purposes-
  2. (a) providing for the keeping of dogs under control by the owner, or the person in charge of the dogs, in such manner as may be prescribed by the order;
  3. (b) providing for the seizure, detention and disposal, including destruction, of dogs not being kept under control in the manner prescribed by the orders;
  4. (c) providing for any dogs to be treated in such manner as may be prescribed by the order;
  5. (d) providing that no person shall move or cause to be moved any dog out of the area unless he or she has first obtained the written permission of a veterinary officer;
  6. (e) providing for the recovery by any veterinary officer of the expenses incurred in respect of the detention of any dog seized and detained and disposed of under such orders from the owner of the dog.
  7. (2) Such orders shall be notified in such manner as the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may think fit, and unless disallowed by the Minister, and until so disallowed, shall have the full force of law, and every person failing to comply with any such order commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding six currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months, or both.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

8. Power of Commissioner to authorise laying of poison

(1)

The Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may, in case of an outbreak or expected outbreak of rabies in any area, after making an order under section 7(1)(a) , lay or authorise any other person to lay poison in any place or places in the area for the purpose of destroying stray dogs or other animals likely to be suffering from rabies.

(2)

Notwithstanding subsection (1), no poison shall be laid in any place unless the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology has satisfied the Minister that-

(a)

sufficient notice has been given to persons living in or near any place where poison is to be laid that the poison will be laid;

(b)

reasonable steps have and will be taken to ensure that no person and no animal under proper control is likely to consume or be otherwise affected by the poison.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Power of Commissioner to authorise laying of poison”.

“(1) The Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may, in case of an outbreak or expected outbreak of rabies in any area, after making an order under section 7(1)(a), lay or authorise any other person”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

4
  1. (1) The Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may, in case of an outbreak or expected outbreak of rabies in any area, after making an order under section 7(1)(a), lay or authorise any other person to lay poison in any place or places in the area for the purpose of destroying stray dogs or other animals likely to be suffering from rabies.
  2. (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), no poison shall be laid in any place unless the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology has satisfied the Minister that-
  3. (a) sufficient notice has been given to persons living in or near any place where poison is to be laid that the poison will be laid;
  4. (b) reasonable steps have and will be taken to ensure that no person and no animal under proper control is likely to consume or be otherwise affected by the poison.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions
Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

9. Prohibition of entry of animals from infected countries

(1)

Subject to the approval of the Minister, the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may by statutory order prohibit the entry into Uganda of any animals from any country where rabies is known to exist.

(2)

Any person who brings or who authorises the bringing into Uganda of any animal in respect of which an order made under this section is in force, commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding six currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months, or both.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Prohibition of entry of animals from infected countries”.

“(1) Subject to the approval of the Minister, the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may by statutory order prohibit the entry into Uganda of any animals from any country where rabies is known to exist.”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

2
  1. (1) Subject to the approval of the Minister, the Commissioner of Livestock and Entomology may by statutory order prohibit the entry into Uganda of any animals from any country where rabies is known to exist.
  2. (2) Any person who brings or who authorises the bringing into Uganda of any animal in respect of which an order made under this section is in force, commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding six currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months, or both.
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

10. Indemnity and compensation

No action shall lie against the Government or any officer of the Government or any person authorised by any such officer for any act done in accordance with this Act, and no compensation shall be payable to any person for any act done in accordance with this Act; but the Minister may direct compensation to be paid in special cases

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Indemnity and compensation”.

“No action shall lie against the Government or any officer of the Government or any person authorised by any such officer for any act done in accordance with this Act, and no compensation shall be payable to any person for any act done in accordance with this Act; but the Minister may direct compensation to be paid in special cases”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. No action shall lie against the Government or any officer of the Government or any person authorised by any such officer for any act done in accordance with this Act, and no compensation shall be payable to any person for any act done in accordance with this Act; but the Minister may direct compensation to be paid in special cases
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

11. Rules

The Minister may make rules for prescribing fees for the inoculation, testing, disinfecting and maintenance of dogs and for better carrying into effect the purposes of this Act

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Rules”.

“The Minister may make rules for prescribing fees for the inoculation, testing, disinfecting and maintenance of dogs and for better carrying into effect the purposes of this Act”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. The Minister may make rules for prescribing fees for the inoculation, testing, disinfecting and maintenance of dogs and for better carrying into effect the purposes of this Act
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

12. Power to amend Schedule

The Minister responsible for finance may, by statutory instrument, with the approval of Cabinet, amend the Schedule to this Act Schedule (Sections 1 , 12 )

Currency point A currency point is equivalent to twenty thousand shillings.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked
Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.
What this section does
Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Power to amend Schedule”.

“The Minister responsible for finance may, by statutory instrument, with the approval of Cabinet, amend the Schedule to this Act Schedule (Sections 1, 12)”
Primary legislation Source quotation matched
Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved
Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1
  1. The Minister responsible for finance may, by statutory instrument, with the approval of Cabinet, amend the Schedule to this Act Schedule (Sections 1, 12)
Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions
Amendment notes

No section-specific note is recorded. Act-level consolidation history:

  • [Amended by Law Revision (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2023 (Act 17 of 2023) on 28 July 2023]

Act-level history only · Do not infer that every amendment changed this section

Authority status: legislation is primary authority; judgment weight follows the displayed court level and the ratio caveat. Check version history

Original Laws of Uganda consolidation (as at 31 December 2023) — public-domain legislation, consolidated by ULII / Laws.Africa (CC BY 4.0). This is a point-in-time text and may not reflect later amendments; confirm against the latest Uganda Gazette before relying on it.