Whistleblowers Protection Act

Interpretation

In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires

"authorised officer" means the Speaker of Parliament or Deputy Speaker of Parliament, the Executive Director of the National Environment Management Authority in case of environment issues, a Resident District Commissioner, a senior ethics officer with the Directorate of Ethics and Integrity, a human rights commissioner with the Uganda Human Rights Commission, the Director of Public Prosecutions, an inspectorate officer of the Inspectorate of Government and a police officer not below the rank of Assistant Inspector of Police;

"currency point" has the value assigned to it in the Schedule to this Act;

"disclosure" means any declaration of information made by a whistleblower with regard to the conduct of one or more persons where the whistleblower has reason to believe that the information given shows or tends to show one or more of the following-

(a)

that a criminal offence or other unlawful act has been committed, is being committed or is likely to be committed;

(b)

that a miscarriage of justice has occurred, is occurring or is likely to occur;

(c)

that a person has failed, is failing or is likely to fail to comply with any legal obligation to which that person is subject; or

(d)

that any matter referred to in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) has been, is being or is likely to be deliberately concealed;

"employee" means a person who has entered into a contract of service or contract for services or an apprenticeship contract, and includes a person who is employed by or for the Government of Uganda, including the Public Service, a local authority or a parastatal organisation and a member of the Uganda Peoples' Defence Forces;

"employer" means a person or group of persons, including a company or corporation, a public, regional or local authority, a governing body of an unincorporated association, a partnership, a parastatal organisation or other institution or organisation, whatsoever, for whom an employee works or has worked,

or normally worked or sought to work, under a contract of service or contract for services; and includes the heirs, successors, assignees and transferors of a person or group of persons for whom an employee works, has worked, or normally works;

"good faith" means the honest intent to act without taking an unfair advantage over another person and includes honesty, fairness, lawfulness of purpose and absence of any intent to defraud;

"harass" means a systematic, persistent or continual unwanted and annoying pestering that may include threats or demands;

"impropriety" means conduct which falls within any of the categories of the definition of disclosure referred to in paragraphs (a) to (d) irrespective of whether or not-

(a)

the impropriety occurs or occurred in the Republic of Uganda or outside the Republic of Uganda; or

(b)

the law applying to the impropriety is that of the Republic of Uganda or outside the Republic of Uganda;

"Minister" means the Minister responsible for ethics and integrity;

"occupational detriment" means a reasonable belief or fear on the part of the whistleblower that he or she may be subjected to dismissal, suspension, harassment, discrimination or intimidation;

"parastatal" means a body owned wholly or controlled by Government or an agency of Government;

"protected disclosure" means a disclosure made to-

(a)

an authorised officer;

(b)

an employer;

(c)

a nominated disclosure officer;

"regulations" mean regulations made under this Act;

"victimisation" means and includes-

(a)

dismissal;

(b)

suspension;

(c)

denial of promotion;

(d)

demotion;

(e)

redundancy;

(f)

harassment;

(g)

negative discrimination measures;

(h)

intimidation; and

(i)

threat of any of the matters set out in paragraphs (a) to (h);

"whistleblower" means a person who makes a disclosure of impropriety under this Act.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Definition

This section supplies the definitions or statutory meaning governing “Interpretation”.

“In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires "authorised officer" means the Speaker of Parliament or Deputy Speaker of Parliament, the Executive Director of the National Environment Management Authority in case of environment issues, a Resident District Commissioner, a senior ethics officer with the Directorate of Ethics and Integrity, a human rights commissioner with the Uganda Human Rights Commission, the Director of Public Prosecutions, an inspectorate officer of the Inspectorate of Government and a…”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

Use this definition when interpreting other provisions that employ the language addressed by “Interpretation”.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

14

"currency point" has the value assigned to it in the Schedule to this Act;
"disclosure" means any declaration of information made by a whistleblower with regard to the conduct of one or more persons where the whistleblower has reason to believe that the information given shows or tends to show one or more of the following-
"employee" means a person who has entered into a contract of service or contract for services or an apprenticeship contract, and includes a person who is employed by or for the Government of Uganda, including the Public Service, a local authority or a parastatal organisation and a member of the Uganda Peoples' Defence Forces;
"employer" means a person or group of persons, including a company or corporation, a public, regional or local authority, a governing body of an unincorporated association, a partnership, a parastatal organisation or other institution or organisation, whatsoever, for whom an employee works or has worked,
"good faith" means the honest intent to act without taking an unfair advantage over another person and includes honesty, fairness, lawfulness of purpose and absence of any intent to defraud;
"harass" means a systematic, persistent or continual unwanted and annoying pestering that may include threats or demands;
"impropriety" means conduct which falls within any of the categories of the definition of disclosure referred to in paragraphs (a) to (d) irrespective of whether or not-
"Minister" means the Minister responsible for ethics and integrity;

6 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Disclosure of impropriety

(1)

A person may make a disclosure of information where that person reasonably believes that the information tends to show-

(a)

that a corrupt, criminal or other unlawful act has been committed, is being committed or is likely to be committed;

(b)

that a public officer or employee has failed, refused or neglected to comply with any legal obligation to which that officer or employee is subject;

(c)

that a miscarriage of justice has occurred, is occurring or is likely to occur; or

(d)

that any matter referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c) has been, is being or is likely to be deliberately concealed.

(2)

Subject to any other law to the contrary, any disclosure of an impropriety made by a whistleblower is protected where he or she-

(a)

makes the disclosure in good faith;

(b)

reasonably believes that the disclosure and any allegation of impropriety contained in it are substantially true;

(c)

makes the disclosure to an authorised officer;

(d)

maintains the confidentiality of his or her identity as whistleblower and takes reasonable steps to avoid its discovery; and

(e)

maintains the confidentiality of the information contained in the disclosure.

(3)

The protection afforded to a whistleblower under this Act shall not cease when his or her identity as whistleblower has been revealed, where the whistleblower was not responsible for the revelation.

Section analysis 2 source-matched judicial passages Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Disclosure of impropriety”.

“(1) A person may make a disclosure of information where that person reasonably believes that the information tends to show-”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

12

(1) A person may make a disclosure of information where that person reasonably believes that the information tends to show-
(a) that a corrupt, criminal or other unlawful act has been committed, is being committed or is likely to be committed;
(b) that a public officer or employee has failed, refused or neglected to comply with any legal obligation to which that officer or employee is subject;
(c) that a miscarriage of justice has occurred, is occurring or is likely to occur; or
(d) that any matter referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c) has been, is being or is likely to be deliberately concealed.
(2) Subject to any other law to the contrary, any disclosure of an impropriety made by a whistleblower is protected where he or she-
(a) makes the disclosure in good faith;
(b) reasonably believes that the disclosure and any allegation of impropriety contained in it are substantially true;

4 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

2

Industrial Court — contextual authority ✓ Source matched

We respectfully found it impossible to believe that he made this report. In any case, Section 2 of the Whistleblowers Protection Act provides for the protection of disclosures of impropriety, but this is conditional upon the disclosure being made in good faith, the non-disclosure of the person making the disclosure, and specifically for the person making such disclosure to take steps to avoid discovery and for the person to keep the information contained in the disclosure confidential.

Bamusonighe Samuel William v Uganda Electricity Generation Company Limited (Labour Dispute Reference 82 of 2021) [2026] UGIC 70 (3 July 2026)

[2026] UGIC 70 · Industrial Court · 2026-07-03

Court level is shown; confirm that the quoted proposition forms part of the ratio before treating it as binding.

Industrial Court — contextual authority ✓ Source matched

Determination [98] Under Section 2 of the Whistleblowers Protection Act, 2010 (from now WPA)a "disclosure" means any declaration of information made by a whistleblower with regard to the conduct of one or more persons where the whistleblower has reason to believe that the information given shows or tends to show one or more of the following-

Aporo_v_Mercy_Corps_Uganda_(Labour_Dispute_Reference_14_of_2021)_[2024]_UGIC_23_(11_March_2024)

[2024] UGIC 23 · Industrial Court · 2024-03-11

Court level is shown; confirm that the quoted proposition forms part of the ratio before treating it as binding.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Persons qualified to make disclosures

(1)

Disclosures of impropriety may be made-

(a)

by an employee in the public or private sector in respect of their employer;

(b)

by an employee in respect of another employee;

(c)

by a person in respect of another person; or

(d)

by a person in respect of a private or public institution.

(2)

Nothing in this Act shall be construed as prohibiting the making of anonymous disclosures.

(3)

A person who makes an anonymous disclosure shall not be entitled to the protection conferred under this Act.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Persons qualified to make disclosures”.

“(1) Disclosures of impropriety may be made-”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

7

(1) Disclosures of impropriety may be made-
(a) by an employee in the public or private sector in respect of their employer;
(b) by an employee in respect of another employee;
(c) by a person in respect of another person; or
(d) by a person in respect of a private or public institution.
(2) Nothing in this Act shall be construed as prohibiting the making of anonymous disclosures.
(3) A person who makes an anonymous disclosure shall not be entitled to the protection conferred under this Act.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Persons to whom or institutions to which disclosure may be made

(1)

Disclosures of impropriety may be made internally to an employer of the whistleblower in cases where the whistleblower's complaint pertains to his or her place of employment.

(2)

External disclosures may be made in the following instances-

(a)

where the complaint does not pertain to the whistleblower's employment;

(b)

where the whistleblower reasonably believes that he or she will be subjected to occupational detriment if he or she makes a disclosure to his or her employer;

(c)

where the whistleblower reasonably believes or fears that evidence relating to the impropriety will be concealed or destroyed if he or she makes the disclosure to his or her employer; or

(d)

where the complaint has already been made and no action has been taken or the whistleblower reasonably believes or fears that the employer will take no action.

(3)

External disclosures of impropriety may be made to any of the following institutions-

(a)

the Inspectorate of Government;

(b)

the Directorate of Public Prosecutions;

(c)

the Uganda Human Rights Commission;

(d)

the Directorate for Ethics and Integrity;

(e)

the Office of the Resident District Commissioner;

(f)

the Parliament of Uganda;

(g)

the National Environment Management Authority; and

(h)

the Uganda Police Force.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Persons to whom or institutions to which disclosure may be made”.

“(1) Disclosures of impropriety may be made internally to an employer of the whistleblower in cases where the whistleblower's complaint pertains to his or her place of employment.”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

15

(1) Disclosures of impropriety may be made internally to an employer of the whistleblower in cases where the whistleblower's complaint pertains to his or her place of employment.
(2) External disclosures may be made in the following instances-
(a) where the complaint does not pertain to the whistleblower's employment;
(b) where the whistleblower reasonably believes that he or she will be subjected to occupational detriment if he or she makes a disclosure to his or her employer;
(c) where the whistleblower reasonably believes or fears that evidence relating to the impropriety will be concealed or destroyed if he or she makes the disclosure to his or her employer; or
(d) where the complaint has already been made and no action has been taken or the whistleblower reasonably believes or fears that the employer will take no action.
(3) External disclosures of impropriety may be made to any of the following institutions-
(a) the Inspectorate of Government;

7 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Compulsory receipt of disclosures

(1)

An authorised officer shall receive all disclosures made by a whistleblower.

(2)

When a disclosure of impropriety is made to a person specified in section 4 , the person shall-

(a)

make a record of the time and place where the disclosure is made;

(b)

give to the whistleblower an acknowledgment in writing of receipt of the disclosure; and

(c)

keep the writing in which the disclosure is made confidential, and in safe custody pending investigation of the impropriety.

(3)

Notwithstanding subsection (1), receipt of a disclosure by an authorised officer shall not preclude the exercise of his or her discretion in determining whether or not the disclosure reveals actionable impropriety.

(4)

Where the authorised officer receiving the disclosure is satisfied, after a preliminary investigation-

(a)

that the matter contained in the disclosure is trivial, frivolous, vexatious or not made in good faith; or

(b)

that further investigation would be unnecessary or improper, he or she may stay the investigation.

(5)

The whistleblower shall have a right to receive a written communication from the authorised officer stating the reasons for the refusal to continue with the investigation.

(6)

Subsections (4) and (5) shall not prejudice the right of the whistleblower to present the dismissed complaint to the Minister.

(7)

The Minister may, upon receipt of a dismissed complaint presented by the whistleblower, cause fresh investigations into the complaint or reject the complaint upon being satisfied that the complaint has no merit to warrant an investigation to be carried out and shall inform the whistleblower of the action taken and the outcome of such action.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Compulsory receipt of disclosures”.

“(1) An authorised officer shall receive all disclosures made by a whistleblower.”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

12

(1) An authorised officer shall receive all disclosures made by a whistleblower.
(2) When a disclosure of impropriety is made to a person specified in section 4, the person shall-
(a) make a record of the time and place where the disclosure is made;
(b) give to the whistleblower an acknowledgment in writing of receipt of the disclosure; and
(c) keep the writing in which the disclosure is made confidential, and in safe custody pending investigation of the impropriety.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1), receipt of a disclosure by an authorised officer shall not preclude the exercise of his or her discretion in determining whether or not the disclosure reveals actionable impropriety.
(4) Where the authorised officer receiving the disclosure is satisfied, after a preliminary investigation-
(a) that the matter contained in the disclosure is trivial, frivolous, vexatious or not made in good faith; or

4 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

Section 4 · Persons to whom or institutions to which disclosure may be made

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Procedure for making disclosure

(1)

A disclosure of impropriety may be made orally or in writing.

(2)

All forms of information communication technology may be used to convey a disclosure.

(3)

The disclosure shall contain as far as practicable-

(a)

the full name, address and occupation of the whistleblower;

(b)

the nature of the impropriety in respect of which the disclosure is made;

(c)

the name and particulars of the person alleged to have committed, who is committing or who is about to commit the impropriety;

(d)

the time and place where the alleged impropriety is taking place, took place or is likely to take place;

(e)

the full name, address and description of a person who witnessed the commission of the impropriety;

(f)

whether the whistleblower has made a disclosure of the same or of some other impropriety on a previous occasion and if so, about whom and to whom the disclosure was made; and

(g)

if that person is making an employment related disclosure, whether the whistleblower remains in the same employment.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Procedural rule

This section establishes the governing procedure for “Procedure for making disclosure”.

“(1) A disclosure of impropriety may be made orally or in writing.”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

A litigant should address this rule at the procedural stage named in the section and preserve evidence of compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

10

(1) A disclosure of impropriety may be made orally or in writing.
(2) All forms of information communication technology may be used to convey a disclosure.
(3) The disclosure shall contain as far as practicable-
(a) the full name, address and occupation of the whistleblower;
(b) the nature of the impropriety in respect of which the disclosure is made;
(c) the name and particulars of the person alleged to have committed, who is committing or who is about to commit the impropriety;
(d) the time and place where the alleged impropriety is taking place, took place or is likely to take place;
(e) the full name, address and description of a person who witnessed the commission of the impropriety;

2 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Reduction of disclosure into writing

(1)

Where a whistleblower makes a disclosure orally, the person to whom the disclosure is made shall cause the disclosure to be reduced into writing containing the same particulars as are specified in section 6(3) .

(2)

The writing required to be made under subsection (1) shall be read over, interpreted and explained to the whistleblower in a language the whistleblower understands and the whistleblower shall certify that the information contained in the statement is true and correct before making a mark to it.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Reduction of disclosure into writing”.

“(1) Where a whistleblower makes a disclosure orally, the person to whom the disclosure is made shall cause the disclosure to be reduced into writing containing the same particulars as are specified in section 6(3).”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

2

(1) Where a whistleblower makes a disclosure orally, the person to whom the disclosure is made shall cause the disclosure to be reduced into writing containing the same particulars as are specified in section 6(3).
(2) The writing required to be made under subsection (1) shall be read over, interpreted and explained to the whistleblower in a language the whistleblower understands and the whistleblower shall certify that the information contained in the statement is true and correct before making a mark to it.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

Section 6 · Procedure for making disclosure

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Investigation

(1)

Where a disclosure of impropriety is made to a person specified under section 4 , the authorised person shall investigate or cause an investigation into the matter and take appropriate action.

(2)

Any investigation undertaken in respect of the disclosure of impropriety shall be carried out expeditiously.

(3)

Where the authorised person to whom the disclosure is made determines that he or she does not have the capability to undertake the investigation, he or she shall, within seven working days, refer the disclosure to a competent authority provided for in section 4(3) or to the Minister.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Investigation”.

“(1) Where a disclosure of impropriety is made to a person specified under section 4, the authorised person shall investigate or cause an investigation into the matter and take appropriate action.”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

3

(1) Where a disclosure of impropriety is made to a person specified under section 4, the authorised person shall investigate or cause an investigation into the matter and take appropriate action.
(2) Any investigation undertaken in respect of the disclosure of impropriety shall be carried out expeditiously.
(3) Where the authorised person to whom the disclosure is made determines that he or she does not have the capability to undertake the investigation, he or she shall, within seven working days, refer the disclosure to a competent authority provided for in section 4(3) or to the Minister.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

1

Citing judgments are indexed, but no express interpretive proposition has yet passed the passage-verification threshold. Open Judicial treatment for the citing passages.

Related provisions

Section 4 · Persons to whom or institutions to which disclosure may be made

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Protection from victimisation

(1)

A person shall not be subjected to any victimisation by his or her employer or by any other person on account of or partly on account of having made a protected disclosure.

(2)

A whistleblower shall be considered victimised on account of making a protected disclosure where-

(a)

the whistleblower, being an employee is-

(i)

dismissed;

(ii)

suspended;

(iii)

denied promotion;

(iv)

demoted;

(v)

made redundant;

(vi)

harassed;

(vii)

intimidated;

(viii)

threatened with any of the matters set out in subparagraphs (i) to (vii);

(ix)

subjected to a discriminatory or other adverse measure by the employer or a fellow employee; or

(b)

not being an employee, the whistleblower is subjected to discrimination or intimidation by a person or an establishment affected by the disclosure.

(3)

A whistleblower who honestly and reasonably believes that he or she has been victimised as a result of his or her disclosure may make a complaint to either the Inspectorate of Government or the Uganda Human Rights Commission for redress.

(4)

Notwithstanding subsection (3), a whistleblower may seek redress for victimisation by bringing a civil action in a court of law.

(5)

A complaint made under subsection (3) shall contain the following particulars-

(a)

the name, description and address of the whistleblower;

(b)

the name, description and address of the whistleblower's employer or any other person who the whistleblower claims has victimised him or her; and

(c)

the specific acts complained of as constituting victimisation.

(6)

A whistleblower shall not be considered victimised if the person against whom the complaint of victimisation is directed-

(a)

has the right in law to take the action complained of; and

(b)

the action is demonstrably unrelated to the disclosure made.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Protection from victimisation”.

“(1) A person shall not be subjected to any victimisation by his or her employer or by any other person on account of or partly on account of having made a protected disclosure.”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

22

(1) A person shall not be subjected to any victimisation by his or her employer or by any other person on account of or partly on account of having made a protected disclosure.
(2) A whistleblower shall be considered victimised on account of making a protected disclosure where-
(a) the whistleblower, being an employee is-
(i) dismissed;
(ii) suspended;
(iii) denied promotion;
(iv) demoted;
(v) made redundant;

14 further items remain in the statutory text above.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Protection against court action

A whistleblower shall not be liable to civil or criminal proceedings in respect of a disclosure that contravenes any duty of confidentiality or official secrecy law where the whistleblower acts in good faith

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Protection against court action”.

“A whistleblower shall not be liable to civil or criminal proceedings in respect of a disclosure that contravenes any duty of confidentiality or official secrecy law where the whistleblower acts in good faith”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1

A whistleblower shall not be liable to civil or criminal proceedings in respect of a disclosure that contravenes any duty of confidentiality or official secrecy law where the whistleblower acts in good faith

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

State protection

(1)

A whistleblower who makes a disclosure and who has reasonable cause to believe that-

(a)

his or her life or property; or

(b)

the life or property of a member of the whistleblower's family, is endangered or likely to be endangered as a result of the disclosure, may request for State protection and the State shall provide the protection considered adequate.

(2)

For the purposes of this section, "family" means spouse, father, mother, child, grandchild, brother or sister.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Definition

This section supplies the definitions or statutory meaning governing “State protection”.

“(1) A whistleblower who makes a disclosure and who has reasonable cause to believe that-”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

Use this definition when interpreting other provisions that employ the language addressed by “State protection”.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

4

(1) A whistleblower who makes a disclosure and who has reasonable cause to believe that-
(a) his or her life or property; or
(b) the life or property of a member of the whistleblower's family, is endangered or likely to be endangered as a result of the disclosure, may request for State protection and the State shall provide the protection considered adequate.
(2) For the purposes of this section, "family" means spouse, father, mother, child, grandchild, brother or sister.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Application to court for assistance

Where in the course of an investigation under section 8 , the investigator has reasonable grounds to believe (a) that evidence or documents relevant to the investigation are likely to be destroyed, concealed, tampered with; or

(b)

that a person willing to provide information relevant to the investigation is being restrained by pressure of obligation to a confidentiality agreement with the persons or official secrets law to which the disclosure relates, the investigator may apply to the court for an order to preserve the evidence or documents or to release the person willing to provide the information from the perceived restraint.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Scope rule

This section defines when and how “Application to court for assistance” applies.

“Where in the course of an investigation under section 8, the investigator has reasonable grounds to believe (a) that evidence or documents relevant to the investigation are likely to be destroyed, concealed, tampered with; or”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

Confirm that the matter and forum fall within this section before applying the Act's remaining provisions.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1

(b) that a person willing to provide information relevant to the investigation is being restrained by pressure of obligation to a confidentiality agreement with the persons or official secrets law to which the disclosure relates, the investigator may apply to the court for an order to preserve the evidence or documents or to release the person willing to provide the information from the perceived restraint.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

Section 8 · Investigation

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Void employment contracts

(1)

A provision in a contract of employment or other agreement between an employer and an employee is void if it-

(a)

seeks to prevent the employee from making a disclosure;

(b)

has the effect of discouraging an employee from making a disclosure;

(c)

precludes the employee from making a complaint in respect of victimisation;

(d)

prevents an employee from bringing an action in court or before an institution to claim relief or remedy in respect of victimisation; or

(e)

if it has the effect of creating fear or discouraging the employee from making a disclosure.

(2)

Subsection (1) shall apply to a contract of employment or agreement in existence on the commencement of this Act.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Void employment contracts”.

“(1) A provision in a contract of employment or other agreement between an employer and an employee is void if it-”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

7

(1) A provision in a contract of employment or other agreement between an employer and an employee is void if it-
(a) seeks to prevent the employee from making a disclosure;
(b) has the effect of discouraging an employee from making a disclosure;
(c) precludes the employee from making a complaint in respect of victimisation;
(d) prevents an employee from bringing an action in court or before an institution to claim relief or remedy in respect of victimisation; or
(e) if it has the effect of creating fear or discouraging the employee from making a disclosure.
(2) Subsection (1) shall apply to a contract of employment or agreement in existence on the commencement of this Act.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Disclosing identity of whistleblower

Any person who unlawfully discloses, directly or indirectly, the identity of a whistleblower, commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding one hundred twenty currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Disclosing identity of whistleblower”.

“Any person who unlawfully discloses, directly or indirectly, the identity of a whistleblower, commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding one hundred twenty currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Disclosing details of disclosure

Where a person to whom the disclosure is made fails to keep confidential the disclosure, the person commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding one hundred twenty currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Disclosing details of disclosure”.

“Where a person to whom the disclosure is made fails to keep confidential the disclosure, the person commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding one hundred twenty currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1

Where a person to whom the disclosure is made fails to keep confidential the disclosure, the person commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding one hundred twenty currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Victimisation of whistleblower

Any person who, either by himself or herself or through another person, victimises a whistleblower for making a disclosure commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding one hundred twenty currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Victimisation of whistleblower”.

“Any person who, either by himself or herself or through another person, victimises a whistleblower for making a disclosure commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding one hundred twenty currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Making false disclosures

Any person who knowingly makes a disclosure containing information he or she knows to be false and intending that information to be acted upon as a disclosed matter, commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding one hundred twenty currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Making false disclosures”.

“Any person who knowingly makes a disclosure containing information he or she knows to be false and intending that information to be acted upon as a disclosed matter, commits an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding one hundred twenty currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Unlawfully failing to take action

Any authorised officer who does not take action upon receipt of a disclosure made to him or her, commits an offence and is liable on conviction, to a fine not exceeding one hundred twenty currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Offence or consequence

This section creates or governs statutory liability concerning “Unlawfully failing to take action”.

“Any authorised officer who does not take action upon receipt of a disclosure made to him or her, commits an offence and is liable on conviction, to a fine not exceeding one hundred twenty currency points or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or both”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

A party alleging or defending liability should test the facts and prescribed consequence against each operative requirement.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

0

This section states a single governing proposition and does not enumerate separate elements.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Rewards

(1)

A whistleblower shall be rewarded for his or her disclosure, five percent of the net liquidated sum of money recovered consequent upon the recovery of the money, based on that disclosure.

(2)

A whistleblower shall be paid within six months after the recovery of the money.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Mandatory duty

This section imposes mandatory requirements concerning “Rewards”.

“(1) A whistleblower shall be rewarded for his or her disclosure, five percent of the net liquidated sum of money recovered consequent upon the recovery of the money, based on that disclosure.”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The provision uses mandatory language; the responsible person or institution should be able to demonstrate compliance.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

2

(1) A whistleblower shall be rewarded for his or her disclosure, five percent of the net liquidated sum of money recovered consequent upon the recovery of the money, based on that disclosure.
(2) A whistleblower shall be paid within six months after the recovery of the money.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Regulations

(1)

The Minister may, by statutory instrument, make regulations for the purposes of carrying out or giving full effect to this Act.

(2)

Without prejudice to the general effect of subsection (1), regulations may be made under that subsection for all or any of the following matters-

(a)

further disclosure procedures;

(b)

other persons or institutions to whom disclosures may be made;

(c)

prescribing penalties in respect of the contravention of the regulations not exceeding a fine of one hundred twenty currency points or imprisonment not exceeding five years, or both; and

(d)

an additional penalty not exceeding five currency points in respect of each day on which the contravention continues.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Regulations”.

“(1) The Minister may, by statutory instrument, make regulations for the purposes of carrying out or giving full effect to this Act.”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

6

(1) The Minister may, by statutory instrument, make regulations for the purposes of carrying out or giving full effect to this Act.
(2) Without prejudice to the general effect of subsection (1), regulations may be made under that subsection for all or any of the following matters-
(a) further disclosure procedures;
(b) other persons or institutions to whom disclosures may be made;
(c) prescribing penalties in respect of the contravention of the regulations not exceeding a fine of one hundred twenty currency points or imprisonment not exceeding five years, or both; and
(d) an additional penalty not exceeding five currency points in respect of each day on which the contravention continues.

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

No express internal or cross-Act reference appears in this section.

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Power to amend Schedule

The Minister may, by statutory instrument, with the approval of Cabinet, amend the Schedule to this Act Schedule (Sections 1 , 21 )

Currency point A currency point is equivalent to twenty thousand shillings.

Section analysis Source-linked statutory analysis Source linked

Approved statute annotation. Statutory quotations are matched to this consolidation and judicial passages are linked to judgments. Check the primary sources alongside this analysis.

What this section does

Statutory power

This section confers or regulates the statutory power described as “Power to amend Schedule”.

“The Minister may, by statutory instrument, with the approval of Cabinet, amend the Schedule to this Act Schedule (Sections 1, 21)”

Primary legislation Source quotation matched

Practical effect

The power must be exercised by the authorised decision-maker, within the conditions and purpose stated in the section.

Deterministic editorial synthesis — not a substitute for the statutory text Editorial synthesis approved

Elements or requirements

Operative requirements extracted from the consolidated text.

1

The Minister may, by statutory instrument, with the approval of Cabinet, amend the Schedule to this Act Schedule (Sections 1, 21)

Judicial interpretation

Express propositions in source-matched passages from judgments citing this section.

0

No judgment in the current Wakilii corpus expressly cites this section. Bare rule-number references are not assigned where the Order cannot be verified.

Related provisions

Section 1 · Interpretation

Amendment notes

No section-specific amendment note or instrument-level amendment history appears in this consolidation.

Whistleblowers Protection Act

About this Act

Full text of the Act