Egesa & 2 Others v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 133 of 2018)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Murder convictions based solely on circumstantial evidence of prior threats and recent possession of the deceased's phone were quashed as insufficient to prove participation beyond reasonable doubt.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Egesa & 2 Others applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.