Ntwatwa Jackson v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 9 of 2017)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that only a five-justice panel of the Constitutional Court may hear interlocutory applications arising from constitutional petitions; petition dismissed.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Ntwatwa Jackson applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.